Reply
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
mikezoo's Avatar
Old (#1)
Holla all.

When textureing and baking, is it worth it to add polygons to a repeating wall, this way to bump out the normal that would otherwise be flat if viewed from the side( two left side)? you know, matching the highPoly mesh more better. Or would it just be better to leave it one flat plane (far right image.)

Iam also aware that I could "cut" edges into the side of my "wall" to better match the high-poly mesh. But I think that if I do create stone blocks for the lowpoly then its worth it to keep em seperate because I can make those lower and look better. I think at least.

Anybody have any ideas or suggestions, I would love hear em'. Iam at the crossroads at which method to take and which would actually be the best.



Cheers!
Offline , polygon, 527 Posts, Join Date May 2008, Location san Diego, CA  
   Reply With Quote

Peris's Avatar
Old (#2)
depends on the polygon budget you have, but i like doing this kind of stuff sometimes, it can be worth the extra 10 triangles or so to get rid of the flatness =)
Offline , polycounter, 963 Posts, Join Date May 2006, Location Stockholm  
   Reply With Quote

Eric Chadwick's Avatar
Old (#3)
If you have the budget for a more fancy shader, you could try parallax.
http://wiki.polycount.net/Parallax_Map

Parallax doesn't solve the edge problem though, only the interior "extrusions". Some great images and tips in the rock tutorials thread. Simply put, you can make a quick displacement map of your wall, use that map to displace a highly-subdivided plane, then run Polycruncher on it.
Offline , Polycount.com Editor, 6,674 Posts, Join Date Oct 2004, Location Boston USA  
   Reply With Quote

mikezoo's Avatar
Old (#4)
Thanks guys.

You know, Ive had polycruncher sitting on my compurter for awhile now, but never actually installed because I only started using max about 4months ago. But this morning all of that changed.
Wow! the power of polycruncher is amazing.
Offline , polygon, 527 Posts, Join Date May 2008, Location san Diego, CA  
   Reply With Quote

Mark Dygert's Avatar
Old (#5)
So amazing they rolled it into 3dsmax2009 as part of the creative extensions pack. Along with my other favorite plug-in SoundTrax.
(AKA Vig) Portfolio | Lab | Brawl | Decker |
Offline , Polycount.com Editor, 13,904 Posts, Join Date Oct 2004, Location Seattle, Wa Send a message via MSN to Mark Dygert  
   Reply With Quote

EarthQuake's Avatar
Old (#6)
I would be careful about sticking a mesh directly on top of a plane, this can really ruin the effect and make the parts that are flat, much more obviously so. But giving a little shape to everything can go a long way.
Offline , Moderator, 8,630 Posts, Join Date Oct 2004, Location Iowa City, IA  
   Reply With Quote

mikezoo's Avatar
Old (#7)
Yeah, Iam noticing that, Earthquake. It seems that I have to tastefully put a mesh here and a mesh there to make it look good and the others not to look flat. Any other ideas.

man, polycruncher is badass.
Offline , polygon, 527 Posts, Join Date May 2008, Location san Diego, CA  
   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 1998-2012 A. Risch