[P&P] - What are you working on? 2008 Edition - Page 13

pliang · on 03-01-2008 05:59 AM

Lol...that's a lot of details for a 64 by 64...

Sage · on 03-01-2008 06:28 AM

Thanks for the feedback. Looking back on the uv layout it seems pointless to give the top portion of the wing separate uv space considering how big it would look on screen. I'll be adding some more details to it and probably fix the uvs since it would allow me sharper decals on the wing. The problem with that is I don't have enough pixels for the decals on the body of the plane. I guess I can use a poly for that. Hmm. That's whay I did what I did I wanted to keep the texture space consistent across the board. Also i wasn't sure how I would paint the plane, with camo or another color. If I was going to do camo on the top portion I like to give the top of the wings unique uvs to paint different patterns. I always disliked how the camo lookes when it's mirrored.

Alex

Sage · on 03-01-2008 08:24 AM

I did an update to the texture, I'm calling it done. Pretty happy with it. Let me know what you think. Thanks.

Alex

StJoris · on 03-01-2008 11:51 AM

I think it will help to focus more on the bigger forms first, and the details later. I like the wing stripes, but the side lose it's shape to noisyness. The model will probably be seen very tiny, so you could question wether you would distinguish the tiny details vs visual noise.

That said it's a cool start, you can show it raw though, without AA.

Sage · on 03-01-2008 01:00 PM

St Joris do you think the shading is too soft? I was looking at your avatar and it made me wonder.

I turned AA off, filter maps, mip mappping all samplers. Did I miss anything? I'm wondering cause the image now doesn't look that different. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I also rendered out the wires. Let me know hat you think. Thanks.

Alex

Tumerboy · on 03-01-2008 02:46 PM

Sage, that's cool (about the UV layout for camo) as long as there was a reason for it (and that's a perfectly valid one) I was just going off what we see here, which seemed like a waste.

Good work though!

thatnumpty · on 03-01-2008 04:06 PM

Uly · on 03-01-2008 04:08 PM

That is a tasty SCAR. : ) Love the detail on the sight.

Sage · on 03-02-2008 01:03 AM

I tried pushing the shading further and fixed a few things I didn't like. Here it is. Thanks for the feedback. Tummerboy your comment was valid, and I don't mind, it's not like your going to hurt my feelings. I post to get feedback, so I can learn and improve. So let me know what you think and thanks. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Alex

Tumerboy · on 03-02-2008 04:57 AM

I call for a dogfight!

did it pretty quick tonight, so it's not as purdy or refined as yours. I'll probably tweak it some more tomorrow.

Sage · on 03-02-2008 05:13 AM

That kicks ass man. I was thinking of cutting up the main body similar to what you did for the uvs. I'll have to give that a go. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I'm working on a DS lamborghini right now, but will be making a spitfire after that.

Alex

multivac · on 03-02-2008 05:55 PM

some vehicles for a RPG project,512x512 diffuse for both of them,1 shared alpha sheet
are the colours too garish?i had to use an unbelievably crappy LCD while working on those,i`m not really sure how they turned out.

http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/913/wirejl8.jpg

MAUL0r · on 03-02-2008 07:57 PM

SUCCESS! After much frustration I've succeeded in getting a model from 3DSMAX into tf2. I'm thinking of making a tutorial to help explain how I did it.

Armanguy · on 03-02-2008 09:02 PM

if you do, i will forever be in your debt [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

EarthQuake · on 03-02-2008 09:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

TACTICOOOOOOL

Detailing looks pretty good aside from the pistol grip, that needs to be revamped, the shape is totally wrong there and you could add some more of the details in too.

http://www.classicarmy.com/SCAR%20BLACK%203.jpg

AsylumSeaker · on 03-02-2008 09:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

These are rockin!

I'm gunna do one my self I think.

Cody · on 03-02-2008 11:23 PM

hour and a half wall test for fun

AsylumSeaker · on 03-03-2008 12:15 AM

~100 tris, 64x64 wip texture

Bout an hours work

spanks · on 03-03-2008 12:59 AM

QUICK SHIELD YOUR EYES!

http://spanks.sourceblog.org/walk_cycle.avi

I'm very new to the whole character animating thing

I've done first person animations for over a year now on and off

This is my first walk cycle with a proper character (thanks for the sdk btw [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img])

the arms were giving me a ton of trouble, so I just gave up on em for now as I need sleep :P

I would greatly appreciate any help!

conman44 · on 03-03-2008 01:51 AM

mine is pretty bad but its my first texture that is this low. but sense everyone else is making these planes ill add my Russian one [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

MAUL0r · on 03-03-2008 02:32 AM

slightly better lighting.

Slaught · on 03-03-2008 11:17 AM

Holy shit, awesum bandwagon! [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

101 tris

Someone has got to make a DS dogfight homebrew with these [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Tumerboy · on 03-03-2008 12:11 PM

Look what you started Sage!

Zwebbie · on 03-03-2008 01:07 PM

That would've been an awesome next Low Poly Challenge for after the DomWar if not everyone had started doing it now.

Tumerboy · on 03-03-2008 02:24 PM

There's plenty to do with lowpoly prop/environment stuff, but they always end up being character based . . . :::grumble, grumble:::