Home General Discussion

Is Modo really that amazing?

1
So with 801 looming around the corner, is it worth learning? I've always had an interest in MODO ever since 301 or so, but never felt to take the time to learn it. And this thread will decide if I and maybe a few others start learning it and convert over!

I currently know 3DS Max and a couple months back switched to Maya. However everytime I read the classic "Maya/Max vs Maya/Max/Other" Thread or something along those lines. Long story short, MODO always ends up getting mentioned somewhere down the line being called "the best modeling program ever".

Is it really "the best modeling program ever" though? What makes it so superior to Max and Maya and other modeling suites? Also for those of you who switched to Modo from a previous program, how has it impacted your workflow? Will you always swear by Modo until you die?

Replies

  • dzibarik
    Offline / Send Message
    dzibarik polycounter lvl 10
    this post may answer your question - http://www.polycount.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2048627&postcount=42

    My opinion is that it solely depends on person's preferences. For example the time you save on amazing selection tools you may lose on iterating without modelling stack. But may be your modelling workflow doesn't depend on stack that much so... again it's just a matter of preference.
  • Swizzle
    Offline / Send Message
    Swizzle polycounter lvl 15
    (Full disclosure: I'm an ardent Modo fanboy and have been using it since 201.)

    In a word, yes. Caveats to follow.

    Modo gives an absurd amount of control and ease of use where subD modeling and retopology are concerned. In addition, there are tons of freely available scripts and plugins that extend and build upon Modo's built-in tools to give it an even greater edge.

    In my opinion, Modo's modeling tools are the smoothest and most intuitive around, once you get the hang of the interface and shortcuts. You can use almost any modeling tool on points, edges, or polygons, you can quickly and easily add cuts and loops to existing geo without having to worry about how many crazy n-gons you're creating (most of the time), and there are a bunch of awesome tools built right in that let you instance, replicate, paint meshes, create arrays, mirror, flip, work in symmetry, snap to grid lines and various parts of meshes, and you can do all of it in 3D, orthographic, or multi-paned hybrid views.

    In addition to the modeling tools, it has a fantastic and bleeding-fast renderer and some of the most well-integrated UV toolsets I've seen in any program. Along with those, there is a very robust macro system and it has Python support for writing new plugins. Basically any action or series of actions you can take in the program could be mapped to a hotkey.

    Caveat time:

    Modo is NOT great for rigging or animation, advanced materials, or complex texturing.
    It also lacks strong viewport shader support.
    It does not have extensive import/export operations (though it does support many formats).
    It can be a huge pain to learn to use after getting used to the likes of Max or Maya.
    It has no modifier stack of any kind, though a large portion of its workflow wouldn't depend on modifiers anyway.
    Its smoothing group tools are kind of abysmal, though they can be improved with a couple of scripts.
    It's expensive, especially for a program that isn't as fully featured animation and scripting-wise as the competition.

    Even with those caveats, I would still recommend it as a primary modeling tool. I have used it on every game-res model I've made in the past several years, and its modeling and retopo tools have saved my ass more than once when Max was being a buggy piece of shit because of all its stupid bolted-on features.

    I'd recommend trying the demo, if possible, and doing some experiments with hard surface modeling, retopology, and UV mapping before making a decision one way or the other before you shell out for the full product. Those are the three areas it's best at, and it may not be worth it to you if you end up preferring tools in Max or Maya to the ones in Modo.
  • ZacD
    Online / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    I really wish modo would do a release or cheaper version that was just focused on being a subdiv modeling tool.
  • WarrenM
    What else do you want it to do? It's already a pretty killer subd tool ... what do you feel it's missing?

    EDIT : Oh, you mean you JUST want the subd tools for a cheaper price. I get it. Well, it's already a third of the price of Max so IMO it already IS a cheaper subd tool. Heh.
  • unit187
    Offline / Send Message
    unit187 polycounter lvl 9
    As an avid Maya user I really loved the way modelling in Modo feels. I used it with my pen and tablet, it is very smooth, fast, gives good results. It can be hard at first, but if you give enough time to learn the app, it will allow you to model lighting fast.

    Now, there are a couple of things that keep me from switching to Modo. As a person who often does level design Modo feels limited when it comes to manipulating large groups of objects and complex hierarchies, and it has weird scale system. I just feel like I lose precise control over my scenes. I know people were making RAGE levels in Modo, but I would rather do it in Maya.

    Another thing I don't like is they didn't bother to calibrate the interface for large monitors. I mean, seriously? The fonts are smaaaaaal, I can't read most of the buttons without leaning forward. The wireframe lines on models are thin and are hard to see too even if you remove opacity from them. I didn't have such problems with any other software, Modo seems to be extraordinary one here.
  • Nox
    Offline / Send Message
    Nox polycounter lvl 5
    Is Modo really that amazing?
    No.
    So with 801 looming around the corner, is it worth learning?
    Yes.
  • Calabi
    Offline / Send Message
    Calabi polycounter lvl 12
    Nah, Wings3D is way better.
  • Torch
    Offline / Send Message
    Torch interpolator
    Nox - TLDR...think you need to shorten that explanation down a bit.
  • repete
    Offline / Send Message
    repete polycounter lvl 6
    would not call it "amazing" but it is a solid well planned modelling app that gets stronger with every release. :poly121:
  • Dataday
    Offline / Send Message
    Dataday polycounter lvl 8
    I see Modo as amazing, but not due to any one individual feature...but rather how they are combined into one solid application, its smart and as a result the pipeline is streamlined and effective.

    There's also the question of Nexus and how it allowed plugins like Mesh Fusion to be made. So perhaps whats under the hood, its framework and or foundation, can also claim that description.

    Its hard to use the word "amazing" though, since depending on how one defines it...no application would ever really be amazing.

    Far more logical to ask what makes X application stand out, or what does it offer that makes it worth using.
  • RobeOmega
    Offline / Send Message
    RobeOmega polycounter lvl 10
    For me it is currently not considerable with most intern and junior positions currently requiring maya or max until they stop that it is unlikely I will use it as my main and as a 16 year old I cannot afford the £999 to buy it and if I could I would buy Zbrush and world machine instead.

    Btw I do not qualify for the educational price since I am not at uni :P
  • ZacD
    Online / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    WarrenM wrote: »
    What else do you want it to do? It's already a pretty killer subd tool ... what do you feel it's missing?

    EDIT : Oh, you mean you JUST want the subd tools for a cheaper price. I get it. Well, it's already a third of the price of Max so IMO it already IS a cheaper subd tool. Heh.

    The problem with Modo for game dev is that it's not a replacement for Max/Maya. And $1000 for an application you are mostly going to use for modeling is a bit much. It would be a great deal if it could do everything Max and Maya does, but it doesn't. I don't might spending a few hundred for a speciality application, but I don't feel like game artists get as much for their money with Modo currently.

    3DCoat is $380, Quixel Suite $100, Zbrush $800, Substance painter + designer $200, Marmoset Toolbat $130, Topogun $100.
  • passerby
    Offline / Send Message
    passerby polycounter lvl 12
    Very solid toolset for retopo, uvs, low poly, subd, but really lacks as far as animation, bakeing and rigging. It is also a bitch to script for, it has a scripting interface but it is very convoluted.
  • Hayden Zammit
    Offline / Send Message
    Hayden Zammit polycounter lvl 12
    I haven't used enough of Modo to fully switch over from Maya, but I can see myself using it over Maya for modeling in future.
    The problem with Modo for game dev is that it's not a replacement for Max/Maya. And $1000 for an application you are mostly going to use for modeling is a bit much. It would be a great deal if it could do everything Max and Maya does, but it doesn't. I don't might spending a few hundred for a speciality application, but I don't feel like game artists get as much for their money with Modo currently.

    3DCoat is $380, Quixel Suite $100, Zbrush $800, Substance painter + designer $200, Marmoset Toolbat $130, Topogun $100.

    As for it not being a replacement for Max/Maya, I've seen Snefer say a few times on here that he only uses Modo. Sounds like it could be a replacement, if you're not wanting to do rigging, animation or baking.
  • WarrenM
    Yeah, if you're not talking animation it's absolutely a replacement for Max/Maya. Modo + xNormal is everything you need for environment art.
  • Dataday
    Offline / Send Message
    Dataday polycounter lvl 8
    @Robeomega, its good to know Maya for job placement, but Modo is accessible via their steam edition ($150), its missing a few features but one can easily get their start learning it there as well. Some studios also will hire Modo specialist, though mostly in other fields like vfx.

    @ZacD, How is it not a replacement for Maya/Max? Modo technically has more features and hits more areas of the pipeline than either max or maya (which are still great applications btw). I think a lot of people are having this misconception that Modo is just a modeling tool, when thats not really the case. Game artist get a lot for the cost of Modo in my opinion. You also get some great results from Modo's baking features (801 is adding cage baking via morph maps).

    Very good UV unwrapping capability, topology tools that can compete with the dedicated retopology applications, sculpting (Zbrush is still #1), texture painting is also pretty good in Modo. You mention substance designer, which is great. This is made even better with a direct plugin for Modo, which lets you work with substances inside of Modo itself.
    See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1-iPexmJ1g

    Wait until they have a 50% off sale and you get quite a bit for less than $1000.

    Modo isnt perfect, but in its current form it can compete extremely well in most areas of the game art pipeline in my opinion.
    chiniara wrote: »
    What about foliage?
    Is it possible to change vertex normals to get correct shading on trees?

    801 will have a tool for manipulating vertex normals. They made it look extremely easy, even to the point of painting the direction you want them to go (imagine brushing hair). 701 also has a plugin by a member of this community that makes it easy to soften edge and vertex normals. Pretty good stuff so far.
  • ZacD
    Online / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    My main worries are poor animation, UV, smoothing groups, viewport shaders, less scripts/addons/utilities/plugins, no particle or simulation systems, less documentation, resources, and tutorials. Actually it's $1,500, I was wrong about it's price. Softimage had a $495 version of their software aimed at freelancers, and a lot of these smaller more specialized applications are competing at lower price points.
  • SurlyBird
    Offline / Send Message
    SurlyBird polycounter lvl 13
    It's a great tool. Amazing in some ways, not so amazing in others. Seeing as you'll probably still need to have Maya and Max skills at most studios (if that's your goal), I would get as awesome with those two tools as possible before going the Modo route (again, depending on your goals). I'm not saying that out of any big love for Maya or Max. It's just the reality of the industry.

    I've been a Modo user since late 301-ish. I got to 601 but didn't upgrade to 701 because, frankly, money was tight and I didn't see much in 701 that looked that compelling. This was pre-MeshFusion. Unless 801 is completely lackluster, I will probably upgrade, simply to to use MeshFusion (I got it on discount when it first was released).

    The biggest dilemma with Modo is that, while it's certainly less expensive than Maya or Max, it currently isn't as fully-featured as either of those two stalwarts and I don't see it ever displacing those tools at most game studios (always will be a supplemental app, IMO). It is very expensive compared to the very capable Blender in which I have completely fallen in love.

    So, it's a kind of a 'caveat emptor' situation. You definitely get great tools for the money, but are there are other worthy alternatives that don't have the same financial obligations? Absolutely. You'll have to just weigh the pros and the cons to see if buying it is a valuable for your particular needs.
  • Bek
    Offline / Send Message
    Bek interpolator
    chiniara wrote: »
    What about foliage?
    Is it possible to change vertex normals to get correct shading on trees?

    Ariel Chai's PipelineIO script has a bent normals function for foliage.

    http://community.thefoundry.co.uk/discussion/post.aspx?f=37&t=41509&p=724667
  • roosterMAP
    Offline / Send Message
    roosterMAP polycounter lvl 12
    it depends on the user. I came in from MAX and I must say that there are a lot of things I like about it, and a lot of things I don't. Needless to say, modo hasn't replaced max for me. Its just another tool. :)
  • igi
    Offline / Send Message
    igi polycounter lvl 12
    chiniara wrote: »
    What about foliage?
    Is it possible to change vertex normals to get correct shading on trees?

    Latest version of Farfarer's Vertex Normal Toolkit has an option for casting a background object's normals to the meshes. It has a similar uses with Normal Thief script in 3dsmax. Useful for overall vertex manipulation for certain parts of the meshes.
  • Nam.Nguyen
    Offline / Send Message
    Nam.Nguyen polycounter lvl 9
    I've just tried some basic modeling in Modo
    and in my opinion:
    . "are Modo is the best modeling program ever ? " - No.


    Modo is still lack something, I've saw a lot of professional use Modo because they have years of EXP, and they know how to solve problems in multiple way, unlike max or Maya that you could found everything on internet
    And Modo is get better and better in every update with some cool feature. Potential !



    . is it a good modeling software and worth to learning ? - Yes.


    I totally agree with ZacD, they should have do a release or cheaper version that was just focused on being a subdiv modeling tool. Modo is damn fast to do some environment pieces
  • WarrenM
    Modo is still lack something, I've saw a lot of professional use Modo because they have years of EXP, and they know how to solve problems in multiple way, unlike max or Maya that you could found everything on internet
    And Modo is get better and better in every update with some cool feature. Potential !
    What do you think Modo is missing? I'll throw deformation cages in to get the list started. Why we can't FFD in Modo is beyond me ...

    But to be fair, I think for everything Modo is missing, you can point to something that it has that Max/Maya doesn't. So every app is (or should be) evolving. No app is the perfect animal yet. Nor will probably ever be...
  • Fisty
    Offline / Send Message
    Fisty polycounter lvl 8
    I use max and modo, I feel like i get my projects done faster in modo :D i hope the new modo will have better exporting options and baking options :D than i wont need max anymore :o
  • peanut™
    Offline / Send Message
    peanut™ polycounter lvl 18
    I was an avid Lightwave user a while back and Modo came along. I was reluctant to use it, because quite frankly Lightwave+Max+Maya was all i needed. It's only as of now that i finally took it up and use it in my projects.

    The strength of Modo is to have all the modeling tools for one shortcut ie: bevel "b" bevels anything whether poly/edge/point under your selection, whereas in Max you would need 5 strokes and 2 shortcuts for the same operation.
  • passerby
    Offline / Send Message
    passerby polycounter lvl 12
    Ya but what you mention there can be done in max,
  • WarrenM
    I DO love that. Bridge is another example ... doesn't care if it's edges or polygons, it just bridges the selection.
  • peanut™
    Offline / Send Message
    peanut™ polycounter lvl 18
    Exactly my point ... Just bridge whatever selection i have.
  • EarthQuake
    peanut™ wrote: »
    I was an avid Lightwave user a while back and Modo came along. I was reluctant to use it, because quite frankly Lightwave+Max+Maya was all i needed. It's only as of now that i finally took it up and use it in my projects.

    The strength of Modo is to have all the modeling tools for one shortcut ie: bevel "b" bevels anything whether poly/edge/point under your selection, whereas in Max you would need 5 strokes and 2 shortcuts for the same operation.

    Same here, except I jumped ship from Lightwave to Modo very early, and couldn't be happier.

    Modo may not be as powerful is Max if you use the stack, but its basic out of the box modeling tools are IMO the best there are. It sort of depends on how you work, if you use a lot of non-destructive stack stuff in Max you'll have a hard time transitioning to Modo.

    VS Maya, I don't really see much that Maya offers for modeling over Modo, animation, etc, sure, but not modeling.
  • peanut™
    Offline / Send Message
    peanut™ polycounter lvl 18
    Yeah EarthQuake we are both in the same boat, i remember the Lightwave days.


    I didn't migrated to Modo because i was too much into Max and Maya. I fairly never model in Max nowadays but i kept Maya in my workflow because its rather good to handle all my import/export (i love the implemented Fbx applet) and still to this day is extensively robust in the curve department. Also some conversion purpose Sub-D to poly.

    Actually one of the strongest workflow i ever had in my career was modeling in Lightwave and send everything in Maya for the final.
  • MDiamond
    Offline / Send Message
    MDiamond polycounter lvl 10
    Dataday wrote: »
    801 is adding cage baking via morph maps.

    801 will have a tool for manipulating vertex normals. They made it look extremely easy, even to the point of painting the direction you want them to go (imagine brushing hair).

    Where did you get that information, my good sir? (I know its just two days to the 801 reveal but a few sneak peaks never hurt :))
  • Dataday
    Offline / Send Message
    Dataday polycounter lvl 8
    MDiamond wrote: »
    Where did you get that information, my good sir? (I know its just two days to the 801 reveal but a few sneak peaks never hurt :))

    If you own a modo license, Brad Peebs, also known as B-Rad, drops sneaks into special subforum (visible to license holders) on the foundry site. One of the videos he showed was cage baking and then an animated gif with vertex normals being moved around with a transform widget, also painted in a direction with a type of manipulation brush.
  • MDiamond
    Offline / Send Message
    MDiamond polycounter lvl 10
    0baa06cb-f98d-470d-8c5d-bd80b6a27a5d.jpg
    Welp. I guess I need to visit The Foundry's Forum more often.
  • Computron
    Offline / Send Message
    Computron polycounter lvl 7
    801. What do we think?
  • BeefWatson
    I'm a Softimage orphan who recently switched to Modo

    I'm loving it, I definitely lost some speed but I feel much more comfortable modeling in Modo than Max or Maya and goodness that renderer!
  • Ravenseye
    I just heard about it like 2 days ago. I hope its amazing.
  • Gheromo
    Offline / Send Message
    Gheromo polycounter lvl 11
    I personally got a positive first impression after using it. One of the things that have been really annoying me on day to day basis was awful snapping as well as terrible raytracing when trying to set manipulator to a certain place. It had tendency to try to snap to objects behind etc, now it works perfectly the way it should! Which makes modeling process less stressful.

    Apart from that I didnt really had any need to use other features yet.
  • PolyHertz
    Offline / Send Message
    PolyHertz polycount lvl 666
    WarrenM wrote: »
    What do you think Modo is missing? I'll throw deformation cages in to get the list started. Why we can't FFD in Modo is beyond me ...

    Last I tried them the spline tools in Modo seemed a bit primitive coming from Max, though I never delved too deep into them...

    iirc there's also no selection memory, so if you have nothing selected and rotate sometimes the camera will fly off into nowhere instead of going based on the last thing that was selected. Other then that navigation in Modo is actually pretty good though.

    The viewport is also a bit feature barren compared to Max/Maya; no custom viewport shaders, realtime shadows/AO, etc.
    peanut™ wrote: »
    The strength of Modo is to have all the modeling tools for one shortcut ie: bevel "b" bevels anything whether poly/edge/point under your selection, whereas in Max you would need 5 strokes and 2 shortcuts for the same operation.

    That's what macros are for; I've written macros to combine almost every max modeling tool I use into just a few context-sensitive hotkeys.
    WarrenM wrote: »
    I DO love that. Bridge is another example ... doesn't care if it's edges or polygons, it just bridges the selection.

    http://armvoid.blogspot.com/2014/02/maxscript-stuff.html
  • MrOneTwo
    Offline / Send Message
    MrOneTwo polycounter lvl 12
    Computron wrote: »
    801. What do we think?

    That snapping is improved which I think is a great news. Also proper cage baking with proper normal maps results. I don't think Modo lacks anything in game art now. I know it doesn't have proper viewport shaders to simulate in engine behaviour but since it's PBR time which app does ?

    801 seems tighter and more useful for game art but haven't worked on any project with it yet. During normal works that's when kinks come out. Hope there won't be any.
  • Bek
    Offline / Send Message
    Bek interpolator
    Here's a question; does the modo steam edition get updated with 801's changes for free?
  • WarrenM
    PolyHertz - I appreciate MaxScript and I know there are a ton of scripts out there for Max. However, if a link to a MaxScript is the answer to every question then why should companies ever write another feature as long as they have a scripting language? You're paying $3,500 for a modeling app - it would be nice to not have to download half of the necessary functionality from ScriptSpot.
  • littleclaude
    Offline / Send Message
    littleclaude quad damage
    Some VFX studios in London are only taking on people with Modo skills in their repertoire.

    I guess the way The Foundry has now dominated the compositing world with Nuke they are now on the hunt for 3D software domination.

    Maybe Autodesk will buy it out and crash it into a cliff like XSI :(
  • Anthony
    Offline / Send Message
    Anthony polycounter lvl 2
    I highly doubt the foundry would let AD near modo, considering they only just got it, and considering what AD have done with Soft.

    I've seen people on here say that modo seems more geared towards VFX lately, and seems to be veering away from game dev, like newtek apparently did with lightwave.

    Has this changed with 801?
  • iniside
    Offline / Send Message
    iniside polycounter lvl 6
    They added cage baking, normal editing and improved animation. I would say it's moving towards fully packed all-in 3d app.
  • PolyHertz
    Offline / Send Message
    PolyHertz polycount lvl 666
    WarrenM wrote: »
    PolyHertz - I appreciate MaxScript and I know there are a ton of scripts out there for Max. However, if a link to a MaxScript is the answer to every question then why should companies ever write another feature as long as they have a scripting language? You're paying $3,500 for a modeling app - it would be nice to not have to download half of the necessary functionality from ScriptSpot.

    I completely agree. But it's not like Luxology have been great about this either, they've relied on Senecas scripts for over a decade to cover holes in the Modo toolset. Writing script in Modo is also more of a pita due to a lack of a built in script editor, which means when you do need a script for something it's that much less likely you'll find it out there.
  • passerby
    Offline / Send Message
    passerby polycounter lvl 12
    PolyHertz wrote: »
    I completely agree. But it's not like Luxology have been great about this either, they've relied on Senecas scripts for over a decade to cover holes in the Modo toolset. Writing script in Modo is also more of a pita due to a lack of a built in script editor, which means when you do need a script for something it's that much less likely you'll find it out there.


    The scripting interface is just more limited and harder to use than Max or Maya as well, you pretty much have to recompose macro strings using a scripting language like python or pearl.
  • WarrenM
    PolyHertz wrote: »
    I completely agree. But it's not like Luxology have been great about this either, they've relied on Senecas scripts for over a decade to cover holes in the Modo toolset. Writing script in Modo is also more of a pita due to a lack of a built in script editor, which means when you do need a script for something it's that much less likely you'll find it out there.

    Agreed on some of that, for sure. The scripting in Modo is ... obtuse, to say the least. Most of my home brew stuff is macros.

    I think Seneca's scripts have been a blessing and a curse. Yes, they fill in a lot of holes in the MODO toolset which is great - but at the same time, that allows Luxology to not work on filling those holes and instead spend yet another development cycle on the renderer.

    I'd love to see them come out with a modeling/game-art focused release but I don't know if it'll ever happen at this point.
  • iniside
    Offline / Send Message
    iniside polycounter lvl 6
    Pack UVs is easily best thing I have seen. I thought that unwrapping and then packing my mega complex mesh (more than 40k tris without symmetry, and 200+ seprate elements), will be true pita.

    Well unwrapping is still PITA, but packing UVs with respected proportions is just single click.
  • PolyHertz
    Offline / Send Message
    PolyHertz polycount lvl 666
    Well the Pack UVs function was in 701 as well (did it change in 801?), but yes it is pretty great. Miles ahead of the one built into Max at the very least.
  • Snefer
    Offline / Send Message
    Snefer polycounter lvl 16
    Pack UVs has been there since... forever? Atleast 301 or 201 I think :)
1
Sign In or Register to comment.