Home General Discussion

Another computer build thread

polycounter lvl 8
Offline / Send Message
Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
Hey guys, I've been getting advice from an IT guy as well as the forums over at NCIX on building my computer. I don't know anything about hardware (okay, maybe I know one or two things). But I just don't trust myself to choose the right parts to work together.

So, here's what someone recommended (with a couple tweeks by myself)
i7-3770K CPU - $329.99
Coolermaster Hyper 212 Plus - $19.99
MSI Z77A-G45 Motherboard - $114.99
Mushkin 32GB DDR3-1600 RAM - $119.99
Crucial M4 Micron C400 SSD 256GB 2.5in SATA3 6Gbps $199
Seagate 2TB HDD - $89.99
Antec 620W Modular PSU - $79.99
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 - $97.99
Fractal Design R4 Black Case - $89.99
Galaxy GTX 680 4GB - $519.99




Anything you would replace?
Total comes to around 2k$ with shipping and tax and stuff.

Mainly need to be able to run lots of apps at once, have maya and zbrush capable of running millions of polys, DX11 capable. I want to be ready for next gen games and engines.

Replies

  • ZacD
    Offline / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    620W is probably the minimum watts you'd want, I'd be worried about issues if you upgrade your gpu or something later.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    Thanks Zac, that's a good example of something I had no idea about.

    What do you think of the videocard? Apparently it's good for gaming; think it will be good for Maya/ game engines?
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    No No No No No

    Nvidia cards have been purposely hobbled in 3D programs in order for them to justify you buying a Quadro, which then you lose gaming performance (which is bass ass backwards for our industry as we want to work on the same equipment as the end user).

    Ever since AMD bought ATI, their cards and drivers have gotten better and better, and they have no issues with 3d programs.

    Also, get Windows 8. Its a bit more streamlined/efficient. Yes, you have to deal with Metro, but there are ways around that, and its not bad after you get used to it.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    So the 640 is good for games but not 3D programs?

    Given the current build, which videocard should I get? Remember, I know nothing. Just want something that's compatible and works like a boss. Is it possible to get one thats good for 3D apps as well as gaming?
  • Kwramm
    Offline / Send Message
    Kwramm interpolator
    been running my i7 + ATI 6950 with a 550w PSU for over 2 years now and no crashes. I even got more HHDs than in this setup. My PSU is from Crucial and probably just as good as the Antec one. nVidia cards do draw more power though, but then again you got 100w more than I do.

    Modern PSUs deliver much better output - e.g. they draw 600 watts and offer e.g. 90% of that to the components, unlike older PSUs which would lose much more.
    Example: Dell ships their Tesla enabled dual Xeons with a 650w 90% efficiency PSU.

    As for ATI, I aree with oXYnary - my ATI card is just super stable. I got less issues than with my old nVidia cards (260GTX, 8800GTX). I do miss CUDA support, but not very often.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    What would be a good ATI card to get? I really don't want to skimp on this. Thanks for the info on the power supply!
  • Kwramm
    Offline / Send Message
    Kwramm interpolator
    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

    The GF is a beast, but then again the next ATI card is 150 bucks cheaper. Depends what you want to do though. My card is down the list by now, but it still manages to drive a 30" and a 22" monitor at respectable FPS with very high settings in e.g. Mass Effect 3 (yes, I finally bought it *mumble*mutter*damn Origin*). UDK also works very well with that.
  • RyRyB
    Offline / Send Message
    RyRyB polycounter lvl 18
    Personally, I think the video card is major overkill. What monitor/resolution are you running at?

    You could easily get a card for 1/2 that price and put the rest into a nice IPS monitor or two. Or a nice desk. Or a chair. All of which will last longer than any hardware you buy and will be better for overall production and health. No point buying a boss of a computer if you aren't comfortable using it.

    My 2 cents! I would kill to have a $2k budget. :)

    Edit: Forgot to add. If you want a computer that will run everything at max and be somewhat-future proof, that will certainly do the trick. :)
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    ZacD wrote: »
    620W is probably the minimum watts you'd want, I'd be worried about issues if you upgrade your gpu or something later.

    No. 620 is major overkill as it is. Unless he plans to runs 2 gpus in the future.

    Also, stick with nVidia OP. My 660ti works awesome with Max, Blender, ZBrush, UDK. ATI is known to play nicer with the more advanced viewing options in Maya, but in general ATI are cards for budget restricted gamers. ATI also have a series like Quadro so they are doing the same 'hobbling' (nothing youll ever notice). Go for the 680, enjoy CUDA and PhysX.

    Also for SSD, go for samsung. I have a crucial one and it works fine, but the failure rate is something like 1.1% whereas the Samsung 830 series is at .5%
  • Overlord
    Most PSU's will give you the best efficiency on a high end system if you run them at 50%-90% load. Too much PSU and you'll waste energy at idle. Too little and your PSU won't be able to handle your GPU at full load. You can't simply throw a 600 Watt PSU at it and call it a day. You should figure out what your idle draw and full load are before you choose a PSU. There is data to support this, check out Tom's Hardware.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supply-psu-review,2916.html

    The RAM is overkill. You'll never use up 32GB before it's time to upgrade again. Go for 16GB at the most.
  • schneller
    Offline / Send Message
    schneller polygon
    I just built a new workstation with both the i7 3770k and the CM 212 Plus. So far, the CPU is super fast, and the cooler keeps temps low, even under full load. Depending on your motherboard and how you seat the cooler, you may want to fill the RAM slot closet to the CPU before mounting the heatsink as the 212 is large and may block it.

    I went with a evga gtx 660 since it was a good compromise in price and power, plus leaves me options if I want to do some gaming in the future.

    Also, I put in 32GB RAM. As Overlord said, probably overkill, but if it's your budget, why not? Saves you having to upgrade that I guess. However, Windows actually reserves space on your boot drive equivalent to the amount of RAM you have so when it hibernates/sleeps, it can dump the RAM, then access it again when you wake it up.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Overlord wrote: »
    Most PSU's will give you the best efficiency on a high end system if you run them at 50%-90% load. Too much PSU and you'll waste energy at idle. Too little and your PSU won't be able to handle your GPU at full load. You can't simply throw a 600 Watt PSU at it and call it a day. You should figure out what your idle draw and full load are before you choose a PSU. There is data to support this, check out Tom's Hardware.

    It ain't that serious, mang. Just get a 500W PSU and you'll be grand.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    Man, the more opinions and information I get the more confusing this becomes. I'm going to stick with the 620. Worst comes to worst I can get more.

    Videocard...still not sure where to go with this. Talked to the computer specialist where I work and he says I shouldnt spend more than 350$ on a videocard, because the top tier stuff is only slightly better and will be replaced soon.

    So...videocard for around $350 that can run dual 24" screens at 1080p with maya and other apps open. Also dx11 (if I can run Unreal engine 4 when its out real time at hi fps with all that cool next-gen stuff, Im happy, just trying to future proof)

    Ram is relatively cheap, so Im going to stick with 32gigs. Theres no downside to having too much ram is there?

    The computer specialist I talked to said a SSD is a waste of money because it hardly makes a difference in load times at all, so maybe its better just to get another internal HD? I wont argue another 2tbs of space.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Andreas wrote: »
    No. 620 is major overkill as it is. Unless he plans to runs 2 gpus in the future.

    Also, stick with nVidia OP. My 660ti works awesome with Max, Blender, ZBrush, UDK. ATI is known to play nicer with the more advanced viewing options in Maya, but in general ATI are cards for budget restricted gamers. ATI also have a series like Quadro so they are doing the same 'hobbling' (nothing youll ever notice). Go for the 680, enjoy CUDA and PhysX.


    The difference is Nvidia Hobbles it on purpose. The ATI is just not optimized for those programs. Dude, I could totally tell going from an older Geforce card to a 240 and 540. My frames were lower, and the card heated up to 60 celsius just moving around simple scenes. I could crash the GPU if I ran Max full screen..

    Go AMD. :P

    And no, 620 isn't major overkill for an I7 and full ATX motherboard.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    oXYnary wrote: »
    The difference is Nvidia Hobbles it on purpose. The ATI is just not optimized for those programs. Dude, I could totally tell going from an older Geforce card to a 240 and 540. My frames were lower, and the card heated up to 60 celsius just moving around simple scenes. I could crash the GPU if I ran Max full screen..

    That... is not a problem with your GPU. There's something different wrong with your system. Never heard of anything that extreme. That certainly isn't an nVidia problem.

    As I said, I get great performance with programmes with my 660ti. It'll be even better with a 670/680 (I would recommend a 670; always buy mid-range more often than spending far too much on a card that will be obsolete in 2/3 anyway.
  • SA_22
    gd luck!!... hope you dont end up with a faulty psu and motherboard like i did!

    my £1,500 machine is sitting next to me in boxes... ordered everything a month ago... :(

    not a happy bunny! lol
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    oXYnary wrote: »

    And no, 620 isn't major overkill for an I7 and full ATX motherboard.

    Sorry but this is proof you havent got a clue what youre talking about mate.
  • Jonathan
    Side Note: I'd stick with an Nvidia card. A little less than a year ago I bought a AMD/ATI 7950 for a little under $500. It's a very fast card, but it's too fragile. I already sent it back once to get it replaced, and I've had other issues, mainly related to drivers. I've always overclocked all my GPUs, and the Nvidia GPUs always did well, but this AMD one feels too much fragile for that. A lot of people have had their 7950s die on them, so I'm avoiding that.

    I've always bought Nvidia cards, but earlier this year Nvidia was dragging their feet, and I wasn't about to buy a year old card for the same price as newer technology.

    I'd stick with an Nvidia 670 or 680 (or a cheaper alternative if you'd like).
  • Overlord
    Andreas wrote: »
    It ain't that serious, mang. Just get a 500W PSU and you'll be grand.

    500W would be the maximum he should buy. His system only draws about 400W at the most. What really matters is the power per 12V rail, not just total wattage. He only needs to buy more power if he intends to add another GPU.
  • JonathanLambert
    Offline / Send Message
    JonathanLambert polycounter lvl 6
    Selaznog wrote: »

    The computer specialist I talked to said a SSD is a waste of money because it hardly makes a difference in load times at all, so maybe its better just to get another internal HD? I wont argue another 2tbs of space.

    He's wrong.
  • almighty_gir
    Offline / Send Message
    almighty_gir ngon master
    i'm running AMD in this machine and i love it.

    i built my son an nvidia machine a couple of weeks ago (gtx 560 ti), total machine build was around £500, and there are no games that it struggles with even remotely.

    honestly man, you don't need to spend more than $1000 US to get an awesome machine. spend the rest on one of the following:
    drugs
    women
    cintiq
    ips monitors
    car
  • Overlord
    i'm running AMD in this machine and i love it.

    i built my son an nvidia machine a couple of weeks ago (gtx 560 ti), total machine build was around £500, and there are no games that it struggles with even remotely.

    honestly man, you don't need to spend more than $1000 US to get an awesome machine. spend the rest on one of the following:
    drugs
    women
    cintiq
    ips monitors
    car

    In that order.
  • EarthQuake
    Overlord wrote: »
    500W would be the maximum he should buy. His system only draws about 400W at the most. What really matters is the power per 12V rail, not just total wattage. He only needs to buy more power if he intends to add another GPU.

    Finally someone who actually understands how power supplies work. I'm so sick of hearing people recommend 700-1000w PSUs when the computers people are actually building only will only ever draw 1/4-1/3rd of that from the mains...

    BUT WHAT IF I WANT TO TRIPPLE SLI BEEFCAKE VIDEO CARDS PLUS INSTALL 12 NEW HARD DRIVES LATER? Well upgrade your PSU later then, the chances you'll actually do that are slim to none.

    The things that are important with PSUs:
    1. Efficiency
    2. Heat/noise (this goes hand in hand with #1, more watts, more heat, more noise to cool).
    3. Modularity/easy of use
    4. Wattage

    In that order!

    Pretty much any efficient PSU around 500w is enough to power any modern computer unless you've got very specific components(high end sli cards, or sli on single card gpus). Its hard to find PSUs less than 500w that will meet the first 3 points, so yeah, wattage really is barely important.

    If you're building a system with very specific power needs, you know what sort of PSU you want, you're not starting threads on polycount to ask about it.
  • Overlord
    EarthQuake wrote: »
    Finally someone who actually understands how power supplies work. I'm so sick of hearing people recommend 700-1000w PSUs when the computers people are actually building only will only ever draw 1/4-1/3rd of that from the mains...

    BUT WHAT IF I WANT TO TRIPPLE SLI BEEFCAKE VIDEO CARDS PLUS INSTALL 12 NEW HARD DRIVES LATER? Well upgrade your PSU later then, the chances you'll actually do that are slim to none.

    The things that are important with PSUs:
    1. Efficiency
    2. Heat/noise (this goes hand in hand with #1, more watts, more heat, more noise to cool).
    3. Modularity/easy of use
    4. Wattage

    In that order!

    Pretty much any efficient PSU around 500w is enough to power any modern computer unless you've got very specific components(high end sli cards, or sli on single card gpus). Its hard to find PSUs less than 500w that will meet the first 3 points, so yeah, wattage really is barely important.

    If you're building a system with very specific power needs, you know what sort of PSU you want, you're not starting threads on polycount to ask about it.

    Well, yeah. Pretty much that. You don't want your machine to idle at below 50% load or you'll be dumping all your efficiency out the back of your PSU. That will run up your energy bill and burn out your PSU prematurely. You do need to look closely at the 12V rails though, they don't always meet the required wattage of your GPU, especially the cheapo PSU's. Anything at least 80 Plus is usually good. Read that label.

    Edit:

    @Selaznog
    Get this PSU, you have the budget. It's super efficient, modular, and the 12V rail is huge.
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817121083
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Andreas wrote: »
    That... is not a problem with your GPU. There's something different wrong with your system. Never heard of anything that extreme. That certainly isn't an nVidia problem.

    It is, and if you paid attention to threads on here like, oh this one.
    http://www.polycount.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92072

    You would see I'm not nearly alone.

    I also showed this to an Nvidia rep, who looked at the system and agreed... agreed that the performance sucked. He even said they were focusing programs ilike that for quadro and any optimization if at all was low on the list for consumer cards.

    So I actually do know what I'm talking about here.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Andreas wrote: »
    Sorry but this is proof you havent got a clue what youre talking about mate.

    I said "major overkill", not "this is the bare minimum".

    All I can do is speak from experience and having a 400watt with an older quad core core2, an older 4800hd, and 2 hardrives could barely boot (as is sometimes it wouldn't). And this wasn't a shit PS either (though not top of the line as well).

    I just did a Calculator, and low and behold...
    Recommended for his setup.. 400 watts.

    http://www.extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine

    The thing is I would still tell someone to get at least 500, as it gives some overhead, and I truly believe if your running your system near the wattage max, the PSU will fail that much faster.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Overlord wrote: »
    Anything at least 80 Plus is usually good.

    ^^This^^
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    Thanks guys, revised parts list:


    Someone at work recommended I replace the default tower fans with Noctua fans as they are much quieter (sound level is important to me)

    Case: Fractal Design Define XL Black E-ATX (this thing is huge)
    Videocard: MSI GeForce GTX 670
    SSD: Crucial M4 Micron C400 SSD 256GB
    HDD: Western Digital Red 3TB SATA3 64MB (struggling to find a reliable hard drive...doesnt seem like any of them are that reliable. might be better to get 3x1tb?)
    Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 ATX LGA1155 Z77
    Processor: Intel Core i7 3770K Unlocked Quad Core Hyperthreading Processor LGA1155
    RAM: Mushkin Enhanced Silverline Stiletto 32GB 4X8GB (ram is cheap, why not?)
    PSU: Antec Basiq BP550 Plus 550W 24PIN ATX 12V V2.2 80PLUS Modular Active PFC
    BluRay: LG CH12LS28 12X Blu-Ray Reader & Lightscribe DVD Writer Combo Drive
    Fans:
    Noctua NH-D14 LGA1155/1156/1366/AM3 I7/I5/PHENOM Heatpipe Cooler w/ NF-P14 140mm & NF-P12 120mm Fan

    Noctua NF-P14-FLX 140mm Ultra Quiet Cooling Fan 750-1200RPM 71-110M3/H 10.1-19.6DBA 4Pin Molex
    (x3)

    Critique me like one your french girls




    (ps: no I'm not some rich jerk doing this for the lulz. I have a loan to pay off, as well as need to save to move out at some point. However right now I'm living at home, don't need a car, no longer have a girlfriend, and getting 30-40 hours of work in a week. Treating myself :) )
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    He's wrong.


    Yup, he is very wrong. Watched a few comparison videos and the difference is incredible. His argument is "how many times are you going to be starting up your computer," but for me it's more about how many times a day I re-open photoshop and maya, not to mention marmoset, n-do etc.
  • Kave
    Offline / Send Message
    Kave triangle
    An SSD is the best upgrade i've made to my PC in years.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Selaznog wrote: »
    Thanks guys, revised parts list:


    Someone at work recommended I replace the default tower fans with Noctua fans as they are much quieter (sound level is important to me)

    Case: Fractal Design Define XL Black E-ATX (this thing is huge)
    Videocard: MSI GeForce GTX 670
    SSD: Crucial M4 Micron C400 SSD 256GB
    HDD: Western Digital Red 3TB SATA3 64MB (struggling to find a reliable hard drive...doesnt seem like any of them are that reliable. might be better to get 3x1tb?)
    Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 ATX LGA1155 Z77
    Processor: Intel Core i7 3770K Unlocked Quad Core Hyperthreading Processor LGA1155
    RAM: Mushkin Enhanced Silverline Stiletto 32GB 4X8GB (ram is cheap, why not?)
    PSU: Antec Basiq BP550 Plus 550W 24PIN ATX 12V V2.2 80PLUS Modular Active PFC
    BluRay: LG CH12LS28 12X Blu-Ray Reader & Lightscribe DVD Writer Combo Drive
    Fans:
    Noctua NH-D14 LGA1155/1156/1366/AM3 I7/I5/PHENOM Heatpipe Cooler w/ NF-P14 140mm & NF-P12 120mm Fan

    Noctua NF-P14-FLX 140mm Ultra Quiet Cooling Fan 750-1200RPM 71-110M3/H 10.1-19.6DBA 4Pin Molex
    (x3)

    I still say no to the Nvidia and point to this thread as proof of the pudding.
    http://www.polycount.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92072
    But its your choice. :)

    Why do you need such a huge case? Think about if you have to move if you get a job and carting that Monster across country.

    You can get a smaller Lian Li aluminum atx case for around that same amount.
    http://ncix.com/products/?sku=41122
    http://ncix.com/products/?sku=46689

    Aluminum dissipates heat better, lighter, but cant take a beating like steel.

    Its not like your overclocking it (the memory you got is not OC [it's cas isn't great either]). In fact if your not Overclocking get the cheaper non unlocked Intel.

    Since your spending that much money on a cooler, I would be personally weary of something that is so generic that it can fit on multiple CPU configs. Last one I got like that fit like crap because it made compromises to fit so many types.

    For the same price you can get this
    http://ncix.com/products/?sku=66277

    Which will make a MUCH quieter system.
  • JamesWild
    Offline / Send Message
    JamesWild polycounter lvl 8
    Pretty much the only advice I might give is: skimp on nothing.

    Cheap cases don't come with dust filters and slowly ruin all your components by allowing them to clog with dust.

    Cheap GPUs often come with poor cooling, or badly designed mountings that damage the BGA package when they heat up.

    Cheap RAM, I've found, is prone to faults.

    Cheap power supplies can die and take everything else with them.

    Cheap SATA cables cause random crashes and hangs.

    Even cheap fans can cause issues. I bought a cheap 120mm fan (less than £5) and the molex power connector wasn't put together properly and shorted +12V to +5V briefly causing a shutdown and a bright blue light.

    You don't have to spend a lot to get a good machine nowadays (I'd say high end CPUs are for anything other than baking a waste of money, and 8Gb of Corsair Vengeance ought to be enough for anybody) but don't buy the cheapest of the cheap anything.

    At best, it'll not allow the rest of your system to reach its maximum potential.

    At worst, it'll damage the rest of your system.
  • Jason Young
    Offline / Send Message
    Jason Young polycounter lvl 14
    I've personally had and see more people with issues using ATI cards. I always thought the general consensus was nvidia works better with most 3d programs due to ati's crap drivers. Unless something drastic has changed in the past couple years I would stick with nvidia cards.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    It hasnt changed, youre right.

    Selz all I would change there is changing the SSD to a Samsung 830 one. Should be around the same price. Get a reputable brand of RAM, but yeah the cheaper the better. RAM is RAM. Corsair are a good brand.
    SSDs are awesome. I remember playing Deus Ex:HR on the PS3, load times were awful. About 4 seconds for me now.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    JMYoung,

    How long ago was this and what generation of cards? I hear people say this, but many times upon further inquiry, it was for older generation cards and drivers.

    Again, I point to that thread above to show at least for 3d, Nvidia hobbles the cards. I dunno, maybe for the 600 series they have finally taken the hint. But the new drivers for the 500 which the 600 share, nothing has improved.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    Thanks for all the info guys. While I'm still behind computer-hardware-wise, I have learned a ton through choosing parts. As for the videocard, as long as it can run game engines (UDK4 when its out, most importantly), then I am happy. I think no matter what, Maya will never have a decent partner from what Ive been reading here and elsewhere. Which is a real shame, considering it's four thousand dollars.

    But yah, as long as I can handle intense next gen scenes real-time in-engine, at a normal framerate, I'm happy.


    @Andreas: Thanks I'll switch that out

    @JamesWild, the thing is that I don't know what's good quality and what isn't. That's the main reason I'm posting here. Quality of product is very important to me. I'm just praying that what I have so far is the best brand of it's tier.

    @OXYnary: Thanks for your input. Currently deciding between that second case you posted and the fractal in my cart. While the fractal is huge, if I move somewhere, I'm gonna be taking other heavy stuff anyways (books). I'm not sure if getting a smaller case would really be worth it/make that huge a difference when moving...I do like the fact that the fractal leaves a lot of room for upgrades and such.
  • Bruno Afonseca
    This png gets updated from time to time, seems like a pretty good reference for me:

    tinyurl.com/falconguide

    http://i1002.photobucket.com/albums/af150/The_FalconO6/CurrentLogicalPCBuyingGuide/Guide.png
  • Kwramm
    Offline / Send Message
    Kwramm interpolator
    Selaznog wrote: »
    (UDK4 when its out, most importantly)
    In that case get at least 16gb RAM. requirements may drop though but still, if you want to multitask and have Maya, Visual Studio or whatever open while you work in UDK it's probably a good idea to have at least that much.
  • Selaznog
    Offline / Send Message
    Selaznog polycounter lvl 8
    Sorry to bump, thought I'd post the damage here
    This'll be fun to pay off...
    sdfvgsrvfsr_by_julionicoletti-d5l0fon.png
  • Kwramm
    Offline / Send Message
    Kwramm interpolator
    ouch?! If the little extra speed is worth it? I grabbed a cheap dell XPS and stuck in a decent video card and it served me faithfully the last 3 years. Including HDD and SSD upgrade it was still cheaper than this setup.

    The in store coverage sounds useless too. If anything ever broke on the PCs I bought then it was the PSU (cheaper than that fee you pay here) or a HDD (sometimes covered by manufacturer. send it in, get new one back). Nothing on the dell broke yet tho. And my gf uses my 6 year old XPS that didn't have any defect yet either. (yes, I'm wary of all those expensive service contracts and extended warranties)
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Kwramm I thought Dells were nigh on unupgradeable?

    What made you got with the EVGA 670 in the end Selz? I find that the EVGAs skimp on cooling. Mind you I have a ASUS 660ti and it sounds like somebody is hoovering in the next room when its on full load heh.
  • Kwramm
    Offline / Send Message
    Kwramm interpolator
    yes and no. The old XPS - the one the size of a small aircraft carrier and an according price - was great to upgrade with tons of huge harddrives (but SSDs are smaller anyway ;) ) and 4 DVD drives (why does anyone need so many 5 1/4 bays???)

    The new Studio XPS is a bit more limited since it's in a mini tower. Then again you can easily fit 4 HDDs + DVD in there without obstructing air flow too much. With HDD capacities of over a TB you should be able to put a lot of storage in it. It also takes a full length double height ATI or nVidia card.

    That leaves you expansion to put e.g. a Wifi card and some other card in there. In my case another SATA controller to bring the total SATA port count to 8. I added two SSDs which I put with velcro tape to the bottom of the case. They don't get hot or anything anyway and I don't have cables running all thru the case.

    PSU is standard ATX, so you can upgrade it. Board is standard ATX too. Then there's a decent card reader in it (didn't fail on any cards yet, unlike the USB ones) and an extra fan - which runs very quiet.

    I'd probably rate this as one of the best PCs I had so far - runs it all from XP to Win 8, Maya to Max, zero blue-screens in 3 years. Only complaint are the USB ports. I wish it had more - only 8 in total. 6 sata ports instead of 4 would be nice too, but maybe I'm asking too much here. Original price was around 800 bucks. Add 300 for 2 SSDs, Add 90 for a stronger PSU.

    Originally it came with a nVidia 260 gtx which wasn't too shabby. Last year I got a new ATI card. But I treat gfx card upgrades extra. For me they're sort of independent upgrades.
Sign In or Register to comment.