Home General Discussion

Attitudes about games

1
polycounter lvl 18
Offline / Send Message
Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
I just read another article talking about how games are somehow destructive or inferior to other activities (like reading, in this article).

Maybe I am preaching to the choir here, but I just wanted to get across what I, and I think a lot of us, feel video games are:

-Video games are the ultimate art form. The last 30,000 years of human endeavor in the arts have been leading to right now-- the developement of the final and most complete art form.

-Video games are not just Pong. Someone should have told this stupid grad student that did the above study that some games consist almost entirely of reading.

-There are over 40,000 people like us who think games are so important that we devote our lives to working on them. We are not all 15 year old boys. We are men and women, fathers, mothers, husbands and wives. We are very creative and very smart because what we do for a living is very very difficult.

Most people who criticize games out there are totally ignorant when it comes to the symbols and conventions of games. It is like an army of illiterate people burning books when these people attack video games. These people are nothing short of Nazis and deserve nothing but contempt for their views.

So when you talk to non-gamers about video games, do what I do; make it painfully clear that you pity them for being so poorly educated. That video games in their billion possible formats is the nacent ultimate art form, and you are helping to bring it to fruition, while they sit in a coma-like stupor just watching non-interactive "entertainment".

Replies

  • aesir
    Offline / Send Message
    aesir polycounter lvl 18
    Games are still pretty primitive in my opinion. They've got a long way to go.

    I can't think of any game that can compare with a really good book.
  • Ferg
    Offline / Send Message
    Ferg polycounter lvl 17
    most art forms were treated the same way in their infancy as games are now. Jazz, rock and roll, 3D art (thank you pixar for helping to change people's opinions on that one), comedy, painting styles... I think it's just a matter of time until the art of gaming has been refined to the point that it breaks out of it's stereotype mold.

    The question is, who's man enough to make those games, those groundbreaking experiences of gaming, that history will look back and view as the milestones in gaming's progression into accepted art?

    Not like it matters, I could give a shit what old people think about my hobby/career, and there will always be art snobs that look down on other forms of art. But games, we still have a ways to go. We'll get there, but just like every other new form of art, it takes time.
  • Leech
    Offline / Send Message
    Leech polycounter lvl 18
    Who cares if it is art or not? What difference does it make?

    Really, what isn't art? The term is prescribed to anything seeking to gain acceptance from a higher authority or the consensus of the populace.

    Games are an entertainment product. If that is art, then so is a slotmachine, a dildo, a dartboard and yo-yos.

    Now what?
  • Tulkamir
    Offline / Send Message
    Tulkamir polycounter lvl 18
    Yea, we are definitely at the dawn of the next greatest art form, though it's not come to full fruition yet.

    I definitely agree with ya though Ninjas. It's very frustrating talking to people who dislike video games merely because of stereotypes and/or the media. Oh well, it'll change, it'll just require a generation or two. smile.gif

    And yea, Ferg is right about how all major art forms have been treated similar (or worse). In all seriousness, everything from books to painting styles to motion picture to music styles have been treated like this. They're only giving us validation that games are indeed *the* new, best art form by treating us the same as those of the past.

    [edit] After reading the article it didn't seem that bad to me Ninjas. The reading part was obviously fairly biased in that it showed the author felt reading was more productive, but overall it seemed fairly neutral.[/edit]
  • Jesse Moody
    Offline / Send Message
    Jesse Moody polycounter lvl 17
    Yeah I have had so many people say I just play games. My wifes grandma actually went as far and said that I didn't have a real job, that I was a loser and video games are for kids. Sadly I had a lot of respect for her until that day. Now my wife won't even speak to half of her family because I stuck up for myself against the old lady and well I guess she didn't like it. Oh well.

    Now living in Maine it is really no different. A lot of people around here think work consists of going out in the woods cutting down trees, doing construction, teaching or something like that. I mention what I do and people are like you play video games for a living? How does that work?

    But so far the worst one I think. I was in the local Gamestop to reserve Halo 3 Legendary Edition. The guys that work there started talking about Rockband and how cool it's gonna be and they were wondering how many guitars there are going to be in game. So just messing around I was like well there is a lot with a lot of different variations. They turned to me and asked how I knew and I said because I'm working on the game as a 3d artist. These three bastards all looked at me then at each other and fucking cracked up laughing. "haha This guy said he works on video games. haha and he lives in Maine. haha."

    I just walked out in disbelief by how stupid some people can be. Oh well.

    BUT back on track. I agree that video games are art forms and we do need a game to go that extra mile to make people see that. Maybe in a couple more years more people will understand.
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    This is the letter I wrote to the research department responsible for the study:

    To whom it may concern,

    I was just reading about a research article one of your graduate students recently had published. Hope Cummings' article, which I have not had the chance of reading yet, was about how games took time away from reading and homework. I understand that your department heads, teachers and students may be woefully uneducated about the video game art form, so I feel it is my duty to point out that a video games can both be almost entirely reading or entirely homework.

    Unlike the more primitive arts, video games can take many forms. The text adventure, or interactive fiction (IF), is a genre of video game that has existed for more than 30 years. There is a vibrant sub-culture of very smart and well educated adults who create and play IF. When your department fails to recognize that games can be reading, you are putting yourself in the dubious company of people who have attacked the output of authors out of ignorance.

    Video games can also be homework. One of my artist colleagues in the game industry is on a team producing an educational game that will be used at public schools. It is hardly the first game to be created for the American public school system. In fact, just about everyone these days understands that games can be useful teaching tools. Perhaps you have heard of Prof. Ryuta Kawashima MD's Brain Training games which have sold over 8 million copies to people in every walk of life.

    The fact is that as an economist and professional game developer, I am constantly dismayed by the poor understanding that non-gamers have about video games. Video games use graphics as symbols that represent what will happen next in the game. Focusing on the what the graphics look like, or what is depicted on the screen at any given time is like focusing on the shapes of letters without understanding that letters form words and sentences that represent ideas.

    Over 40,000 men and women think games are important enough to spend every day working on them. We are not teenagers huddled in basements. We are very smart and capable adult professionals like yourself. Many of us give up jobs that would pay better so that we can advance the art form; because we think the work we do is important.

    Thank you very much for you time.

    Aubrey Serr,
    Game Developer
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    Who cares if it is art or not? What difference does it make?

    Really, what isn't art? The term is prescribed to anything seeking to gain acceptance from a higher authority or the consensus of the populace.

    Games are an entertainment product. If that is art, then so is a slotmachine, a dildo, a dartboard and yo-yos.

    Now what?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    My point is that the article was stupid and that the study had a fundimental flaw based on a misunderstanding about games.

    You can call games whatever you want, but they are obviously art. Not just art but an art form that includes all the other ones and more, and is therefor superior.

    It is pretty clear that games are just starting out. We are in the silent movie era of game development. It is going to take a lot longer than with movies or books or music to produce the best games, because games are much more complicated than any of those other art forms.

    I know that this article wasn't particularly bad, but it is just the last straw for me.
  • Tulkamir
    Offline / Send Message
    Tulkamir polycounter lvl 18
    Good letter, well written Ninjas, however there is one line in it which almost negates the rest. "Hope Cummings' article, which I have not had the chance of reading yet" instantly makes you seem ignorant in your reasons for writing the letter. Just a though, something you may like to change if you haven't already sent it.

    Although, as I said, it did seem like the article you posted was fairly neutral. I mean, two of the highlights of the article are

    -Gaming does not impact time spent with friends and parents
    -Video game play can be a distraction but may not hurt grades

    Doesn't seem too bad to me.
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    It is not easy to track down scientific papers. Sometimes the journals require substantial subscription fees (ie, thousands of dollars). It is possible I could have read it at the university library, but that is just a pain in the ass.

  • John Warner
    Offline / Send Message
    John Warner polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]

    -Video games are the ultimate art form. The last 30,000 years of human endeavor in the arts have been leading to right now-- the developement of the final and most complete art form.


    [/ QUOTE ]

    yes, that would be true, if what's being expressed wasn't complete juvenile over simplistic shit.

    and calling anything "final" is dubious. in fact it's wrong.
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    I actually think calling video games the final art form is pretty safe. If anything comes along it will just be absorbed by games. I will be happy to be wrong though if something really substantial comes along.

    I do agree that most mainstream games are pretty sorry examples of what we could be doing.



    [ QUOTE ]

    -Gaming does not impact time spent with friends and parents
    -Video game play can be a distraction but may not hurt grades

    Doesn't seem too bad to me.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    The implication is that games cannot count as social time, that games are only for kids and that games are never part of school work. Even these "positive" points annoy me
  • Mishra
    Offline / Send Message
    Mishra polycounter lvl 18
    i dont think the attitude about games will change as long as the market is flooded with games where you kill nazis or aliens or zombies. games like shenmue or other deeply involving games come along once in a while. while there are many games with genuine artistic merit, most games out there are not. its the same as how, for example, the fresh prince of bel-air is technically art, while many people do not consider it so.
  • HonkyPunch
    Offline / Send Message
    HonkyPunch polycounter lvl 18
    Games with stories keep my attention longer, simply because I want to know what happens. Violent shooting games are fun as well, but for shorter periods of time.
  • Mishra
    Offline / Send Message
    Mishra polycounter lvl 18
    i agree. the thing with these other forms of art is that there wasnt a huge corporate interest in them in the early years. videogames have been around about 40 years but have only come into the limelight in the last two decades, with major money involved in them.
  • Vermeulen
    Offline / Send Message
    Vermeulen polycounter lvl 18
    I think the problem people have with games is how they seem so unproductive. When it comes to movies, books, or other entertainment, there is always an experience and something that can be learnt, or you come out with more knowledge of some sort. While with games (with the odd exception), I could spend an entire day playing GTA, which I do, and come out with absolutely nothing. I simply occupied my mind with problem solving for the entire day. You can say that playing the same old games for hours can exercise your mind with hand eye coordination, or just help with problem solving ability, but most people don't consider that when they think about productivity.
  • blankslatejoe
    Offline / Send Message
    blankslatejoe polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    I actually think calling video games the final art form is pretty safe. If anything comes along it will just be absorbed by games. I will be happy to be wrong though if something really substantial comes along.


    [/ QUOTE ]

    I dunno, I think there's room for stuff after games. True virtual reality, something like the holodeck for example, would take things so much to a different level that it would cease to become a game--even though it might include games, stories, and interaction within its framework...I'm not sure what you would call that sort of framework, but its a long way off.

    Also, the definition of 'Video' in video games limits its longetivity..."video" is on it's way out. But that's nitpicking over semantics wink.gif
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    I think one of the problems with the game industry is that a lot of the people in charge of greenlighting games didn't grow up with games and are just in it for the money.

    I think games could really benefit from an auteur culture, but the developement tools need to get even better before you start seeing many people trying to make complicated games on their own with any success.

    It's funny because I think video games are the only medium in which people hold up the worst, rather than the best, examples to judge it.

    Blankslatejoe: I get what you are saying. It will be interesting to see if people consider virtual reality just an extension of normal reality, as a "video"game, or as something completely new.
  • adam
    Offline / Send Message
    adam polycounter lvl 19
    Aesir: I can't find a book that compares to a really good video game. smile.gif
  • Ruz
    Offline / Send Message
    Ruz polycount lvl 666
    well who cares what others think. whatever art form you do, you will always get criticism.
    To me games art is pure commerical art, but thats not to say you could n't make it as 'high art' if you wanted in terms of content, but essentially is commercial art, no better or worse than airbrushed athena posters:)
  • HonkyPunch
    Offline / Send Message
    HonkyPunch polycounter lvl 18
    I don't know, virtual reality has always seemed like a bad idea to me, because to achieve virtual reality you basically trick the mind into seeing things that aren't there.
    And in that case, reality and the game world can easily become blurred, especially in impressionable minds. Another thing I see becoming a problem is when we finally get photo-realistic graphics in real time. I mean, what then?
  • blankslatejoe
    Offline / Send Message
    blankslatejoe polycounter lvl 18
    jimmies--yeah, I agree it's a shady idea...but that doesn't mean it won't happen. It's all electric impulses going on up there, and its only a matter of time before we'll have mapped the brain out enough to interface directly... inputing false sensory data in the form of sights/sounds/touch/etc. very matrixy. very shady.

    but, for all the spookiness of it, it would be a completely new medium too.
  • ElysiumGX
    Offline / Send Message
    ElysiumGX polycounter lvl 18
    Medium refers to a material substance which is used to transfer and communicate ideas from one individual (or realm) to others, who can then interpret this product however they choose...this allows for art. Directing an individual's perception through false sensory data without the freedom of choice is not a medium, it's mind control, and no thanks.

    Btw, virtual reality is a silly concept (like time travel), and it died when John Carmack made interactive 3D fun and faster than 5 FPS.
  • StrangeFate
    Offline / Send Message
    StrangeFate polycounter lvl 18
    i'm with 'who cares'.
    It's all a matter of taste, personally i prefer reading a good novel over playing whatever awesome game. Better graphics equal bigger hollywood explosions and the stories and gameplay in games still can't hold a candle against a good old book.
    One day it might, but i suspect it will go down the path hollywood goes. 2 really good games every 3 years, one of them maybe even slightly innovative, and 87 clones of it after that.

    While i would say that games themselves are an art form, it is kinda hard to take them seriously. Let's look at them:
    -Almost all games have a story that can barely keep up with a bad B movie.
    -Most games do look like made by teenagers, unproportionated characters, crappy textures, shitty animations, inconsistent style. Next gen just makes it worse, you can see that bad art and anatomy even better with normalmaps.
    -The gameplay... again, most B movies have more twists and turns than most games do. Sure, running through tunnels and shooting with 10 different guns at monsters that look different but act the same can be fun, but so is tennis, or biking or swimming or drinking. Hardly the culmination of anything but entertainment maybe.

    Games as a respectable art form has still a long way to go imo, if ILM was solely run by your average game artists, we'd be bashing the CG in movies too. And if whoever conjures game stories tried to write the next Foundation killer ...oh dear.

    I've had it too while i lived in uptight switzerland, people looking at me as if i didn't have a real job, telling me 'it would be a shame if you had to get a real job eh ?'.
    I always thought it was funny, i was having a good life working from home for years and some grown up morons with bloody annoying jobs were acting like jelaous teenagers.

    Seriously, when somebody starts like that just laugh straight in their faces. They wont understand your dedication and love or any other sentimental blurb... just keep it simple: Do they have a cool job they love with an awesome atmosphere, can they play pool at work or sit around chatting with coworkers... i'm sure everybody has perks and freedoms most people with normal jobs haven't.

    Don't take your job to serious.
  • JDinges
    Offline / Send Message
    JDinges polycounter lvl 18
    Eh, I've never ran into anyone who thought being in the game industry is a joke. Everyone always thinks it's awesome, they like to reflect on how much their job/career sucks.
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    A lot of people have mentioned that video games are not as deep as a good book. I like books too, and maybe books are the best art form when it comes to telling stories, but that doesn't take anything away from games. Games are their own thing-- I have listened to lots of music but I have never had a song tell a story as deeply as a decent book, and I would never expect it to. Music, movies, books and videogames are all different. Expecting games to be like books or movies ignores the fact that games are different from those other artforms with different strengths.
  • rooster
    Offline / Send Message
    rooster mod
    hm yeah Strangefate I agree that if you take any element of a game and review it as a book or movie it will fail miserably but I think what ninjas is getting at is that games are experiences, we're living in another world.. a flawed crappily rendered and repettetive world- but all of us should know that feeling when you're in synch with the designers and youre kind of playing along with them in their world.. I think those moments when you're totally in the game and living it yourself could be described as art
  • StrangeFate
    Offline / Send Message
    StrangeFate polycounter lvl 18
    I dunno, then being stoned and on a crazy trip is art too ?

    Is magic the gathering art ? Life fantasy roleplaying ? playing with your transformer toys as the designers intended ? They all provide an immersive experience.

    Of course, if actors qualify as artists, then those weirdo fantasy roleplayers are all artists too... where does it stop ? ...anything can be art these days, has been discussed often enough, i'm not even arguing that. Games are art.

    The question here is i suppose, how much more respect should video games get over organized life roleplaying events.

    I think you all expect too much. I'm glad people here where i am now do think that i have the ultimate job, but i don't expect professors to bow before me and show respect because i'm a little artist in a huge entertainment industry.
  • Kovac
    Offline / Send Message
    Kovac polycounter lvl 18
    Good words, StrangeFate. I think inevitably video games won't be portrayed by the masses as anything but a nuisance in our lifetimes, but that doesn't give rhyme or reason to think they aren't.

    The craziest part about working in the game industry is the environment. It IS fun and games, but it's also harder than you'll ever work in your life. I know a lot of people that may stress themselves physically and mentally harder than I do in the work place in a given day... but they'll never amount to the number of hours I've put in.

    It's a whole new methodology on how people work. We play at our jobs, we drink and have a good time at our jobs, but we're also there 60+ hours a week.

    If we didn't have those luxuries WHILE at work, we wouldn't be able to release what we release in the time frames we're given. We're still cogs in a big machine, but that doesn't mean our devotion isn't recognized by the people that we seek to impress.
  • Slainean
    Offline / Send Message
    Slainean polycounter lvl 18
    StrangeFate,

    I like to think of art of as an inclusive term, not an exlusive one, so I would take all those examples as art.

    In terms of pure creative expression, I don't think any one form of art is any more legitimate than another. Personal taste is something else altogether.

    Games should be regarded on equal terms with any other medium, but it has yet to receive even that much respect. I think the industry itself is undeserving in a lot of ways, but the medium itself should not be invalidated just because the industry tends to cater to juvenile tastes. I think the public will come around, once developers become more adventurous and people less technophobic, maybe generations from now as Tulkamir suggested.

    I think people are only asking that professors stop scoffing at the mere mention of video games, not bow to developers.
  • tone
    Offline / Send Message
    tone polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    I don't know, virtual reality has always seemed like a bad idea to me, because to achieve virtual reality you basically trick the mind into seeing things that aren't there.

    [/ QUOTE ]
    It’s interesting that you said that, I was recently listening to a free audiobook of a 2300 year old thesis on that very subject.

    [ QUOTE ]
    And in that case, reality and the game world can easily become blurred, especially in impressionable minds. Another thing I see becoming a problem is when we finally get photo-realistic graphics in real time. I mean, what then?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Something like this?
  • Justin Meisse
    Offline / Send Message
    Justin Meisse polycounter lvl 18
    laugh.gif

    [ QUOTE ]
    Video games are the ultimate art form. The last 30,000 years of human endeavor in the arts have been leading to right now-- the developement of the final and most complete art form.

    [/ QUOTE ]
  • Gav
    Offline / Send Message
    Gav quad damage
    I pretty much agree with everything Strangefate said...I guess that means I'm in the "who cares" group as well. I've just come to terms that we (game developers) won't relate to pencil pushers and vice versa. Although I do consider games an art form, it's really because I can't think of a better way to classify it. I would never call it the ultimate art form, by any means. I don't really think of myself as an artist. Sure, I "create" for a living...but it's usually someone else's idea and for a pay cheque. I'd almost like to say that real "artists" have a totally different lifestyle than me (and I would assume most game artists), devoting their entire being to make something that expresses themselves....I'm not like that, I'm not trying to prove anything or make some bold statement. I just like to make pretty things for games and get paid to do it laugh.gif
  • Frank
    Offline / Send Message
    Frank polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    I just read another article talking about how games are somehow destructive or inferior to other activities (like reading, in this article).

    [/ QUOTE ]
    Have him play any Bioware game and he should calm down. tongue.gif

    Frank the Avenger
  • killingpeople
    Offline / Send Message
    killingpeople polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    "Maybe I am preaching to the choir here, but I just wanted to get across what I, and I think a lot of us, feel video games are:"

    [/ QUOTE ]

    your opinions are your own.
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    I don't really think of myself as an artist. Sure, I "create" for a living...but it's usually someone else's idea and for a pay cheque. I'd almost like to say that real "artists" have a totally different lifestyle than me (and I would assume most game artists), devoting their entire being to make something that expresses themselves....I'm not like that, I'm not trying to prove anything or make some bold statement. I just like to make pretty things for games and get paid to do it laugh.gif

    [/ QUOTE ]

    What you describe as an "artist" there is pretty much exactly what I do. I live frugally, take on contract work here and there to pay the bills and work my ass of on my own projects, or with a few other people, to make the games I want to make.

    Obviously a lot of people here are just working on Generic MMORPG #1630, or Generic Third-Person Shooter # 1289, and that is fine, but to confuse what I am talking about with those games is like confusing Bad Boys 2 with Citizen Kane. It is totally clear to me that there is not a "Citizen Kane" of video games, and that one of the reasons for that is that so many talanted artists are toiling away on another lame knockoff game. At the current rate, video games will NEVER get to that level of quality. Things have actually gotten worse. In the last 10 years there have been virtually no advancements made in game design. The late 90's saw the creation or refinement of the RTS, the FPS, the fighting game and the MMORPG. The 70's and 80's saw equal advancements in game design.

    I personally think that large teams and pandering ball-less executives are to blame for the pathetic state of game design. I think avant-garde game design will be centered around small teams. In the same way that a band has a singer, guitarist and drummer, game development teams need a musician, programmer and artist.

    I have written short stories, and I have worked on movies, music, and scultpure and I there is no doubt in my mind that video games are the hardest to execute. Beyond that, games can be so much more. They can be semi-interactive movies, or text adventures or dancing games. So many people compare games to movies first. I actually think a better comparison is to music, since I think both games and music are more about evoking feelings than telling stories.

    In terms of "getting respect" from the researchers who did this study, it is not even the point. The point is that thier research has fundimental problems, and that they should do their job better. I did, by the way, get a very respectful return email stating that their research was largely misrepresented by the media.
  • Cthogua
    Offline / Send Message
    Cthogua polycounter lvl 18
    In regards to videogames being an art form...well I think anything can be viewed as art depending on which totally arbitrary criteria you pick, however the commercial nature of the production and distribution of videogames is always going to hold it back from being too "artsy" The problem as I see it is that in order to make a "next gen" game you need atleast several million dollars worth of some investors money, and either a large team of artists, programmers and designers, or a smaller team willing to throw themselves on their swords for the project. Its amazing what can be done when groups of talented people come together and combine their skills. It's equally as amazing how every last drop of creativity, innovation, and soul can be drained out of a project purely to satisfy commercial concerns. Its essentially the same problem the film industry is facing, its become too dependent on the numbers to be experimental or innovative. People still make creative, innovative movies, but often at ENORMOUS personal expense. Sometimes they receive financial compensation, and critical praise as a reward for their trying something new, sometimes they recieve nothing other than 3 credit card bills they'll never be able to pay off. Thats not a risk a studio with $100 million sunk into a project is going to be willing to take.
  • Cthogua
    Offline / Send Message
    Cthogua polycounter lvl 18
    While you may consider Citizen Kane to be the most innovative, masterful piece of artful movie making the fact remains that it was a commercial failure and essentially ruined Welles' directing career. Another part of the problem with saying that "There will never be a Citizen Kane of videogames" is that the value of it was only widely recognized later, in a near historical context. There may already be a game out there that bankrupted the company that made it, recieved little or no distribution, and isn't considered particularly fun or interesting that in 50 years might be touted as "the most innovative game in the history of videogame development."

    The problem with true innovation and true originality is that it is nesseccarily "before it's time" People often claim to want to see something they've never seen before. The reality is when confronted with something they truely haven't ever seen before they won't know what to do with it. It won't be widely liked. It won't be successful enough to continue production on more, and generally it will destroy whoever created it. Then, only later when society is ready to understand, or approach it will it be appriciated and accepted.
  • StrangeFate
    Offline / Send Message
    StrangeFate polycounter lvl 18
    Man, i sure wish i could be working on innovative games like you, games that will change the way people see the medium forever and will make other game designers gasp in awe.
    What's the secret ... a new way to group units in an RTS ?
    What are your freetime projects, anything innovative like anime ninja models with giant swords ?
    That sure hasn't been explored enough.

    I had the same lifestyle for 3+ years, but somehow all my personal projects where the same old plug-in player models, textures and props everybody else was doing.
    All the games i helped with in my spare time were, at the end of the day, the same old shooter or scifi RTS or whatever crap too. Of course everybody thinks they can do better and that they have this 1 innovating idea that will set them apart.

    I personally think the main reason why there hasn't been much advancement in game design is:
    1. who cares, there's more to life than games. People want a good and fun life which requires a stable income.
    Approaching games as a superior art form and trying to be all innovative and fancy, instead of seeing them as what they truely are, mass market entertainment, just isn't so safe.

    What is a good game for you, a game worth noting, learning from, drawing inspiration from... a rather innovative and fun game (according to some) that sadly not enough people could relate to and flopped, or what seems to be a generic game that sold 8 million copies and keeps people hooked for years ?

    Personally, i'd rather work on the generic one and be listed among the artists responsible for that game.
    ...althought for the right bonu$, they don't even have to list me.
  • Gav
    Offline / Send Message
    Gav quad damage
    Nicely put, StrangeFate. I couldn't agree more. The lifestyle of being able to do what you want as you want / need to really appeals to me..but I'd bet my life savings that I'd probably spend that time making things I know sells :P
  • Tulkamir
    Offline / Send Message
    Tulkamir polycounter lvl 18
    Just out of curiousity, what exactly is it you guys consider "art"?

    To me art is a method used to communicate an idea. It can be a moral, an abstract philosophy, a more solid idea, an emotion, even "this looks pretty", or "space aliens are bad, it's fun to shoot them!", and can be conveyed in many ways (imagery, speech, writing, action, *interactivity*). Because this is what I feel is art I do feel that video games are the next big artistic movement, just as film is/was. It creates a new manner in which an "artist" can communicate to the audience, perhaps in a more complete form as a game, through interaction, allows the audience to become more deeply involved, and as such allows what is being communicated to be driven home deeper.

    I don't think art is some idiot sitting at home "expressing" himself and not being able to sell his "expressions". That's called a pretentious, lazy arsewad. Should get a job and make himself some use to society.

    Just bringing this up because the people argueing against seem to have opinions based largely in cynisism...
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    The games that have really been innovative and advanced the state of the industry have sold insane amounts. Warcraft, Wolfenstien 3D, Sim City, XCom, Street Fighter 2, Ultima Underworld, Super Mario Bros, etc etc. A lot of times, all it takes is to rehash an old but forgotten game design to sell tons, like diablo, which is just another Rogue-like with prettier graphics.

    Here are some ideas I have had recently:

    - A game that locks itself so you can't play it anymore once your character dies. You only get one chance to beat it

    - A game that lets you only play a certain amount of time each day and rewards you with more playtime as in-game pick-ups

    - A game that "plays itself" when you are not actively controlling it

    - A game with realistic avatar damage (ie, pulled muscle, broken leg, etc)

    - A game that is not set in a sci-fi, fantasy, historic, horror or cutesy setting (that is not a sports or racing title).

    - An FPS game that has no graphics, only sound cues so that blind people can play
  • killingpeople
    Offline / Send Message
    killingpeople polycounter lvl 18
    i have always felt it was pretentious to exclude the "pretentious expressive idiots" works from the title of art.

    i appreciate the amount of respect you have for the title. but, i don't see 'liking' the piece or agreeing with the message is a requirement for a piece of "art". some art wants to piss you off.

    and worse still, as ninja implies, assuming one form of art or medium was greater than all others and had become the final and most complete art form. that obviously is a personal feeling.
  • spacemonkey
    Offline / Send Message
    spacemonkey polycounter lvl 18
    I r content creator!

    Its like the difference between an illustrator and a concept artist. Concept artists are production artists, they are there to serve the needs of the team - explore ideas and portray important information about their subjects to the other team members.
    Some illustrators like to think they are concept artists and don't understand why every picture that they paint cant be this wonderful work of art, with dramatic lighting and interesting compositions and action.

    These people are usually the ones who go around and get frustrated with the industry and leave after a few years. They dont deliver what there teams needs and they selfishly push their own agenda because really dont care about the game, they care about making art.

    -Take the same principals and apply them to your game related art job. Work hard, make things look as good as possible, with in the limitations of the game/platform and be happy.

    Games are meant to be fun, they are commercially driven products and StrangeFate makes good sense! (who would have guessed!!;)) There are indie games just like indie films that are made if you want to do something radically different from whats out there.

    I love cheesy cliche game art! I like demons, aliens and chicks with big guns. Sales figures suggest lots of other people like them to so I am happy to continue making them. smile.gif
  • Tulkamir
    Offline / Send Message
    Tulkamir polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    i have always felt it was pretentious to exclude the "pretentious expressive idiots" works from the title of art.

    i appreciate the amount of respect you have for the title. but, i don't see 'liking' the piece or agreeing with the message is a requirement for a piece of "art". some art wants to piss you off.

    and worse still, as ninja implies, assuming one form of art or medium was greater than all others and had become the final and most complete art form. that obviously is a personal feeling.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Should've explained that part better. Basically, if they are sitting in their basement "expressing" themselves all day and making no money because no one wants to buy their work, it is failed art IMO. If the audience doesn't understand whats being communicating it's not doing its job. What annoys me is that a lot of "artists" will hide behind the "They just don't understand art" sort of idea to justify themselves, rather than trying to figure out why their work isn't communicating itself and improve. But that stuff is moot this this topic, so yea. :S

    Besides, all this crap is terminology. Games are what they are. Labeling them won't make it any different.

    And Ninjas is in a sense right about games being the most complete art form (currently atleast). They combine all the components of other art forms in current use (ex: visuals, motion, audio, literature/story, interactivity, etc...) Whether or not that makes them the best is personal opinion, and whether or not the final is yet to be seen. smile.gif
  • The Umbrella Man
    [ QUOTE ]
    I just read another article
    -Video games are the ultimate art form. The last 30,000 years of human endeavor in the arts have been leading to right now-- the developement of the final and most complete art form.


    [/ QUOTE ]

    I think a master painting is the ultimate art form, but art is subjective, so if the only thing you have ever seen of art is a game, then yeah that's your opinion, but I don't know anyone who can claim to have mastered their art form like lets say Da'Vinci or Michaelangelo. Those were true masters.

    3D is mostly production art, and isn't considered real art by most because it's not a tangible thing like lets say a sculpture made of resin is. It's data, no more no less unfortunately, so I feel it has a long way to go, and I wish it was taken more seriously as a real art but I am afraid we are the only ones who see it that way.

    But 3d is essentially sculpting, so I don't know. The biggest problem I have with games is that they cost far too much to make anymore and have adopted a bigger is better mentality. I haven't played a game that was more engrossing then Fallout, and I'm afraid I never will again, because like with movies, games have to appeal to the masses, and that means more violence, more blood, more realism, and less style, which in my opinion seems to take priority over things like, art style, art direction, story, and gameplay.

    /end rant.
  • Slainean
    Offline / Send Message
    Slainean polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    Approaching games as a superior art form and trying to be all innovative and fancy, instead of seeing them as what they truely are, mass market entertainment, just isn't so safe.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Ignoring the superior artform comment, I disagree with this kind of perspective. If you mean it isn't financially safe, you are correct. Most of my favorite movies were box offices failures, come to think of it. In vain of what Cthogua was saying, creative risks will rarely be financial successes, but it's not always about the money and we're often better for it.

    Movies are about as "mass market entertainment" as you can get, and there are movies that have moved me and entertained me as much as any song or book or painting or what have you.

    I think it's important to take risks in art, and I think this kind of "who cares, there's more to life" mentality is the antithesis to any sort of progress. You could say that same shit about every other endeavor ever undertaken.
    "Paint the Sistine chapel? Who cares, it's only art if it's on a canvas."
    "Climb Mt. Everest? What for?"
    "Go to the moon? Who cares, there's nothing there."

    I'm kinda disappointed that half the people in this thread are just "eh, whatever sells is fine". I was reading an article somewhere saying that the state of games is like going to the theatre, and every screen is showing a Michael Bay movie. I like explosions and guns and superheroes and spaceships and all that stuff, but what's wrong with trying something different? Hell, you might even like it.

    Oh, wait, someone might think we're pretentious for trying anything different. We'd better stay in our safe little corner, right? Come on, now.

    P.S. I am mad because the reply boxes are SO SMALL
  • Joao Sapiro
    Offline / Send Message
    Joao Sapiro sublime tool
    evil genius and lots of original games are still amazing and i consider them works of art. Okami.
  • SuperOstrich
    Offline / Send Message
    SuperOstrich polycounter lvl 17
    I look at making game art in a pretty simple manner: I enjoy doing it, and it pays well. It allows me to enjoy many things in life without having to panic about financial security.

    I have no interest in seeing game art as a socially excepted artform. I am not against it, I just don't care either way. That's not to say I don't enjoy gaining respect from my peers (other game developers), because I certainly do. Why else would I post here? cool.gif
  • StrangeFate
    Offline / Send Message
    StrangeFate polycounter lvl 18
    Slainean.... games will advance, just as movies do. They go and will go through their little evolution, from mute and b/w to sound and color, from 2d to 3d and whatever comes next.

    Do you think your average NASA engineer is trying to change the world, worried about humanity reaching the stars more than about a good paycheck ?

    [ QUOTE ]
    I was reading an article somewhere saying that the state of games is like going to the theatre, and every screen is showing a Michael Bay movie.

    [/ QUOTE ]
    See that's crap, there's as many 'innovative' games out there today as there ever were or more, i don't see why i should worry about it.

    Once upon a time, there used to be fewer games, and everything one made was new, and you couldn't miss it because there weren't that many target platforms either nor $10Mio marketing budgeds overshadowing every other game.
    Now you have DS, PSP, PC, xbox, PS, Wii...

    I think there's enough small developers doing original and innovative content, that anyone who complains or simply wants to create the ultimate whatever can find a spot on some cool DS or PSP team doing games that are fun, innovative and affordable to make and take risks with.

    Money doesn't matter afterall, if you want your name under a game with big explosions you know that it has to be mainstream, because those explosions cost money, that's never gonna change.

    Now that i think of it, Transformers must suck, they changed things to make the movie accessible to a wider audience, damn them. They should have stuck to the original designs only die had fans would like, and done the movie with half the budget and crappy 3D effects... that would have been art.
  • Vermeulen
    Offline / Send Message
    Vermeulen polycounter lvl 18
    I was arguing that calling something the 'superior' art form before doesn't work because of how subjective it is, but thinking about it more games are actually an objectively worse art form. If art is about expression, you can't honest say that games are the best way to express something. Games are simply to occupie the mind with problems to solve.
    It's the ulimate art form simply because it has such a loose definition, as to include video/text? Thats a horrible reason.
    and I pretty much agree with everything Strangefate said
1
Sign In or Register to comment.