View Full Version : Maya Preserve UV's?
motives
06-28-2006, 01:44 AM
Anyone knows if there is there a function in Maya 7 similar to Max's Preserve UV's?
snap.crackle.pop
06-28-2006, 06:12 AM
Remind me again preserve UV's for what purpose ? i know my way pretty well in Maya, why do you need this function ?
motives
06-28-2006, 09:21 AM
uhm preserve UV's works so that you can make geometry changes to E-Poly objects while keeping UV coordinates intact. Then you can make adjustments to the geometry of your model without having to manually edit the UV's.
Im sorry i should have been clearer on the functionality of the tool heh. Imagine most people are versed in one of the program rather then both.
Jeff Parrott
06-28-2006, 09:56 AM
Not that I'm aware of. I haven't been using 7 for that long though. Maybe check on highend?
sinistergfx
06-28-2006, 12:29 PM
Every software NEEDS this feature. I wouldn't want to live without it.
Jeff Parrott
06-28-2006, 12:35 PM
Yeah, I totally agree. I still remember the first time you showed it to me Sinister.
malcolm
06-28-2006, 08:10 PM
Please explain clearly what this does. Are you saying you can lock the uv and move the vert without distorting your uv map?
Rhinokey
06-28-2006, 09:52 PM
pretty much as you move a vert to the left, it moves the vert also on the uvmap at the same time so the texture stays undistorted, theres certain instances that it is still unperfected.. but its still a damn handy toool
sinistergfx
06-29-2006, 04:37 AM
I've found the best way around the "underpectness" is to completely triangulate (temporarily) the area you're having problems with. It keeps it from distorting oddly. Huzzah.
Gizmo
06-30-2006, 05:15 PM
I think you will find that deleting an edge that is not a UV border edge, using the "delete edge" command; Maya7 will preserve UV's (or as per; the "delete vertex" command). Earlier versions do not preserve uvs.
While we are on the subject, I would like to know if anyone else recognises how silly it is that the bevel command does not create UVs accordingly!?
Marine
06-30-2006, 07:16 PM
maya has always had the shittiest bevel tool ever devised by man
rooster
07-01-2006, 05:47 AM
I would like to suggest that it was, infact, devised by the devil
thomasp
07-02-2006, 06:05 AM
no, the devil was too busy working on byron's free maya bevel plugin. that one erased every single chunk of uv coordinates from your entire mesh as soon as you beveled something. /images/graemlins/laugh.gif
malcolm
07-02-2006, 10:00 AM
Agreed, Byron is shit and so is MJ, they are junk. Now that we have completed departed from the original subject does the max bevel preserve uv's?
[ QUOTE ]
Now that we have completed departed from the original subject does the max bevel preserve uv's?
[/ QUOTE ]
Yep, it does. Can get a little stretchy if you bevel (chamfer) along a UV seam though.
EdgeChEx (free plugin, muuuch nicer, all-quad bevelling) does an even better job of preserving original UV's.
thomasp
07-03-2006, 05:09 AM
yes, bevelling in max sometimes manages to keep the uv's /images/graemlins/wink.gif
i'm off to trying out that plugin. thanks mop!
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.